"Do you have the proof?"
"Yes."
"Will you provide it?"
"Yes."
"Can I have it?"
"No."
Pretty much all you need to know about the veracity of this asshole's claim.
Remember Donald Trump tweeted this guy's name as his go to guy on proving that up to 3 million individuals voted illegally in this last election.
Yet when given the opportunity to provide it, this idiot uses important sounding buzzwords to distract from the fact that he has a big fat nothing.
If this guy seriously had this data then why does he not provide copies of it to other statisticians who are undoubtedly better suited to get through it quickly and reach a conclusion a hell of a lot faster than several months into the future?
To me this sounds very much like Trump's claim that he had "investigators" in Hawaii who could "not believe" what they were finding concerning President Obama's birth certificate.
Source http://ift.tt/2jINIec
"Yes."
"Will you provide it?"
"Yes."
"Can I have it?"
"No."
Pretty much all you need to know about the veracity of this asshole's claim.
Remember Donald Trump tweeted this guy's name as his go to guy on proving that up to 3 million individuals voted illegally in this last election.
And Phillips certainly gave the impression that he had proof in hand to make that assertion.Look forward to seeing final results of VoteStand. Gregg Phillips and crew say at least 3,000,000 votes were illegal. We must do better!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 27, 2017
We have verified more than three million votes cast by non-citizens.— Gregg Phillips (@JumpVote) November 13, 2016
We are joining .@TrueTheVote to initiate legal action. #unrigged
"Completed analysis" certainly sounds to me as if there is readily available documentation for this outrageous claim.Completed analysis of database of 180 million voter registrations.— Gregg Phillips (@JumpVote) November 11, 2016
Number of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million.
Consulting legal team.
Yet when given the opportunity to provide it, this idiot uses important sounding buzzwords to distract from the fact that he has a big fat nothing.
If this guy seriously had this data then why does he not provide copies of it to other statisticians who are undoubtedly better suited to get through it quickly and reach a conclusion a hell of a lot faster than several months into the future?
To me this sounds very much like Trump's claim that he had "investigators" in Hawaii who could "not believe" what they were finding concerning President Obama's birth certificate.
Source http://ift.tt/2jINIec
